blah blah blah
Feb. 10th, 2005 09:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
venusplzTomorrow, I meet Phill. Saturday is probably the wake. Sunday, Chinese New Year. Monday and Tuesday, Valentine's Day stuff. Wednesday, a trip to Stony Brook that should last until the weekend. Maybe Alex will come with me. Next weekend, I don't know... maybe I'll go hang out with Lynda. Haven't bothered her in a while.
So, yesterday, I got a new baby cousin, who, as far as I know, still has no name. His (the baby's) father and grandmother (not mother and son) are fighting, which is always fun, you know? I don't know why the grandmother wants in. She already named her kids. She's had problems with Alvin (my first cousin, the baby's father) since Day One, and from what I can get from what I know about this woman, she's psycho.
'bout halfway done with Piece Two. I'll take a break this weekend and pick it back up when I go to Stony Brook (though I doubt I'll get much accomplished there).
I'm confused about something and I have no one to whine to about it because no one would understand it. And the one person who would is... unavailable at the moment. I need more friends, I think. More friends that are interested in the same things that I am, anyway.
Relatedly, I've been working on a family tree. And no matter how many different ways I try to do something, I can't fit everyone in. See, everyone who's in the same generation is supposed to be on the same horizontal line. Moms are all supposed to be on one side, dads on the other (so that if you trace all the way up the right side of the tree, you get your dad's dad's dad's dad... etc. or your mom's mom's mom's mom... something like that, but never your paternal grandmother, if you follow what I'm saying, which you might not so I'm going to close the parentheses ... now). Siblings should be kept in birth order, left to right. No matter how hard I try to follow those three rules, I can't fit certain people in without crossing lines or sticking in a half-gen, or a footnote, switching around a mom and dad (so that you WOULD find your paternal grandmother up one side of the tree)... it's awful. The best I can get, cleanly, of the twenty-six people I have to place, is twenty-one, but mostly because those are direct ancestors. It's so frustrating! Oh well. I'll think of something... by July. >.>;;;
Happy 18th birthday, Joe! ^_^ You're finally a grown-up!!
'73? ... I think I did something wrong.
Once, Roadkill found a candy heart that had my name on it and he gave it to me. I've still got it in a trumpet mouthpiece box I taped shut.
So, yesterday, I got a new baby cousin, who, as far as I know, still has no name. His (the baby's) father and grandmother (not mother and son) are fighting, which is always fun, you know? I don't know why the grandmother wants in. She already named her kids. She's had problems with Alvin (my first cousin, the baby's father) since Day One, and from what I can get from what I know about this woman, she's psycho.
'bout halfway done with Piece Two. I'll take a break this weekend and pick it back up when I go to Stony Brook (though I doubt I'll get much accomplished there).
I'm confused about something and I have no one to whine to about it because no one would understand it. And the one person who would is... unavailable at the moment. I need more friends, I think. More friends that are interested in the same things that I am, anyway.
Relatedly, I've been working on a family tree. And no matter how many different ways I try to do something, I can't fit everyone in. See, everyone who's in the same generation is supposed to be on the same horizontal line. Moms are all supposed to be on one side, dads on the other (so that if you trace all the way up the right side of the tree, you get your dad's dad's dad's dad... etc. or your mom's mom's mom's mom... something like that, but never your paternal grandmother, if you follow what I'm saying, which you might not so I'm going to close the parentheses ... now). Siblings should be kept in birth order, left to right. No matter how hard I try to follow those three rules, I can't fit certain people in without crossing lines or sticking in a half-gen, or a footnote, switching around a mom and dad (so that you WOULD find your paternal grandmother up one side of the tree)... it's awful. The best I can get, cleanly, of the twenty-six people I have to place, is twenty-one, but mostly because those are direct ancestors. It's so frustrating! Oh well. I'll think of something... by July. >.>;;;
Happy 18th birthday, Joe! ^_^ You're finally a grown-up!!
You Belong in 1973 |
1973 If you scored... 1950 - 1959: You're fun loving, romantic, and more than a little innocent. See you at the drive in! 1960 - 1969: You are a free spirit with a huge heart. Love, peace, and happiness rule - oh, and drugs too. 1970 - 1979: Bold and brash, you take life by the horns. Whether you're partying or protesting, you give it your all! 1980 - 1989: Wild, over the top, and just a little bit cheesy. You're colorful at night - and successful during the day. 1990 - 1999: With you anything goes! You're grunge one day, ghetto fabulous the next. It's all good! |
'73? ... I think I did something wrong.
You Are A Romantic Realist |
You are more romantic than 40% of the population.  You tend to be grounded when it comes to romance. Sure, you can fall hard... but only for someone you've gotten to know. And once you're in love, you can be a total romantic goofball... But you'd never admit it to your friends! |
Once, Roadkill found a candy heart that had my name on it and he gave it to me. I've still got it in a trumpet mouthpiece box I taped shut.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 03:40 pm (UTC)Gen